A bit of a blast from the past. Just went back and re-read Chadder's "demolition" of my refutation of TEA. It's hysterical! The guy makes so many errors of logic it's impossible to keep track of them all.

I actually accepted a "debate" with him on one condition back in March of 2014 - before this was posted.

I challenged him to submit TEA to a reputable journal of religious philosophy for peer review. I said I would gladly debate him if and when it passed that hurdle. Needless to say, the silence since - apart from this one post that doesn't reference it at all - has been deafening.