On Jan 24th 2013, on his “Atheism is a Religion”
blog, Chad Elliott posted:-
"As illustrated above, for anything you disbelieve in,
you must also believe that that thing does not
exist. There is no possible example that an atheist, or anyone else
for that matter, can present, which would provide evidence to the contrary.
Why? Because it's a logically impossible task. If you disbelieve
something exists, then you believe that that something does not
exist. In other words. If you disbelieve (A) exists, then
you believe (A) does not exist. This is basic logic and proves
once and for all that atheism is in fact a belief system. It's the belief that
a God does not exist.
I will take this entire post down if someone can provide me an example to the contrary."
I will take this entire post down if someone can provide me an example to the contrary."
To which, on Jan 27th
2013, I responded:
“… do you believe
that I am wearing a yellow shirt? To put the question more technically, do you
believe the proposition "Peter is wearing a yellow shirt at this
moment" is true? It's a simple question where the meanings of all the
terms are relatively straightforward, so there shouldn't be any issue with
comprehension. There are lots of people wearing yellow shirts every day, so
there is no issue with logical or physical impossibility.
However, you really
have no way of knowing what I am wearing right now. I might not even be wearing
a shirt, never mind a yellow one. There's just no reasonable basis for you to
believe that I am wearing a yellow shirt. You can believe that it's possible
that I'm wearing a yellow shirt, and you might reasonably believe that I
sometimes wear a yellow shirt, but you shouldn't believe that I am wearing one
right now. You also know that I dislike the colour yellow.
By the same token,
though, you also shouldn't believe that the proposition "Peter is wearing
a yellow shirt" is false. Your ignorance of what I am wearing should
prevent you from denying this proposition the same way it prevents you from
affirming it. As you can see, not believing that this proposition is true isn't
the same as believing the proposition is not true: not affirming that I am
wearing a yellow shirt doesn't entail denying that I am wearing a yellow shirt.
(adapted from Austin Cline)
As I have now
provided you with a logical example of how a lack of belief in something does
not entail a positive belief in its antithesis – in other words, proof that
disbelief in the existence of God is NOT the same a believing God does not
exist – I assume you will honour your pledge – “I will take this entire post
down if someone can provide me an example to the contrary” – and take down
this page…”
I gave him 24 hours to remove the post; he hasn't.
So – this is the notification (Official) that Chad Elliott
has been totally and completely owned by me and doesn't have the guts to admit
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment